Lucy Rowett
Content warning: this article (original post by Lucy Rowett here) contains spoilers and mentions of sexual assault.
If you are feeling particularly vulnerable around this topic, best not to read this, or skip to the end.
Have you been watching Bridgerton? Like many people, I binge watched Bridgerton in a few days, and certainly got all hot and bothered at all the sex scenes. It was delightful titillation with more of a female focus, which depicted masturbation and cunnilingus along with good old PIV sex, along a rather questionable form of birth control.
While Bridgerton is being hailed as a modern historical romance because of it’s feminist message, diverse cast members, and re-working of modern hits by Ariana Grande and Taylor Swift into classical pieces, there is one scene that is particularly problematic which isn’t being discussed as much.
The scene where Daphne sexually assaults Simon.
Yes, Daphne sexually assaults her husband, Simon, The Duke of Hastings, and I’ll explain why.
I’m trying not to ruin the plot too much, but in a nutshell:
I’ve set the scene, now I’ll explain exactly why this is sexual assault, why we need to talk about male rape, why it was depicted so poorly in the Netflix series and in the book, and what we can learn from it.
It doesn’t look like a typical, “rape”, scene, does it? They love each other, they’ve been bonking the hell out of each other so far, and Simon was initially enthusiastically taking part in sex with Daphne. Bridgerton is supposed to be a romping historical romance, you aren’t supposed to see the main female love interest assaulting her husband.
And here lies the problem.
This was absolutely sexual assault, and this is often what sexual assault looks like. Sexual assault most commonly occurs between people who know each other- not by a random stranger in a bush. They are often already in a relationship with each other, or whom have already consented to sex.
Even today in 2021, how we understand consent is incredibly basic, which we see reflected in the shockingly low rates of convictions for sexual assault, and how rape victims are treated in the media.
In the case of Daphne and Simon, while she did not intend Simon harm, what she did was not an accident but deliberate, because Daphne knew that Simon did not wish to ejaculate inside her, and yet she forced him to because she had him pinned down.
You may be thinking:
But guys can’t get raped, can they? If he consented to sex then how could it be rape?
Wrong.
Consent to sex is not a one-stop process, and many sexual assaults occur when the participants initially consented to sex, but it developed into something they did not consent to.
While Simon consented to sex with Daphne, he did not consent to ejaculating inside of her, thus making it assault. There is the added racial factor in the Netflix series, Simon is played by a black actor, Rege-Jean Page, whereas Daphne is played by a white actor, Phoebe Dynevor.
Here are some other examples of sexual assault:
In all of these examples, while there was consent to some sexual activity, there was also a violation of consent, which is sexual assault.
Make no mistake: ANY kind of unwanted sexual activity counts as sexual assault, and it is a myth that only women/people with vulvas can be assaulted.
Which leads onto the topic of male rape.
Men/people with penises can and do get raped by women, even if they had an erection. In the same way that vaginal lubrication during a sexual assault does not equal consent- genital response does not equal consent.
Read more about genital non-concordance here.
The #MeToo movement also highlighted male rape and sexual abuse, and the added shame that they experience because it’s not “supposed” to happen to a man.
There is a narrative that a man/penis owner should be up for all kinds of sex, all the time, and if they have an erection it means they wanted it, end of. Just man up and get on with it.
This is why it is so important to be versed in consent and how it needs to be applied to ALL genders- including men and trans/non-binary folk.
WHAT IS CONSENT, THOUGH? DOESN’T IT JUST RUIN THE MOMENT?
Let’s use the Planned Parenthood acronym for consent:
F - Freely given
R - Reversible
I - Informed
E - Enthusiastic
S - Specific
If we apply this to the scene in Bridgerton, it’s pretty clear.
While Simon Freely gave his consent to have sexy times with Daphne, he did not consent Freely to ejaculating inside of her. His consent was Reversed, and he was not Informed about what she planned to do, and you can see from his face that he is not Enthusiastic about it. He had never told her Specifically that he did not want to ejaculate inside her, but this was the purpose for Daphne assaulting him.
This was assault, plain and simple, but the problem is that it isn’t treated as such or addressed in the Netflix depiction or in the book.
They depict Daphne’s frustration and feeling betrayal that Simon lied to her about not being able to have children, but very little to the fact that she assaulted him, and his feelings of hurt and betrayal.
We do see that this caused a rift in their relationship, but it is overly focused on Daphne’s feelings and his trauma behind why he does not want to have children.
Bridgerton is styled a a feminist-style historical romp, with lots of dialogue about how women had very little rights and the double standards they faced, which is absolutely true. It also had a diverse cast—despite not fully addressing the issue of race either.
They missed a glaring opportunity to explore male rape and the emotional consequences of it. If they had shot a scene whereby Simon could talk about the emotional impact of this and it was explored with Daphne, it could have been a great teaching moment, but alas, they didn’t.
Despite both the Netflix depiction and the book fail at creating this teachable moment, there is a lot we can learn from this.
First, we can appreciate how our understanding of consent and assault has changed so drastically just in the past few years.
While the story is set in the early 1800s- where we would expect there to be little understanding of consent or assault- the book was actually written in 2000.
Despite it being only 20 years, the public discourse and understanding of consent and assault was wildly different to now- mostly thanks to the #MeToo movement.
While it is frustrating the author is quoted in interviews that she did not view it as rape, remember that her attitude reflects how many people still understand or don’t understand consent.
Why don’t we use this as a teachable moment to explore what consent is and isn’t, and how we can embody it more in our lives?
Consent is not one-stop shop or a blanket term, it needs to be an ongoing dialogue.
There is no cut off point whereby you no longer are allowed to say, “no”, no matter how aroused your partner is. It is a dangerous myth that there is a “point of no return” when it comes to sex and arousal- especially when it concerns males/people with penises.
It is also a dangerous myth that a male will experience physical harm if they cannot ejaculate- hence the term, “blue balls” should never be an excuse to pressure somebody into unwanted sex or to acquiesce to it.
Think about your own life—both sexual and non sexual interactions.
When have you overridden somebody’s consent or feelings- either in a sexual or non-sexual situation?
Have you ever continued with sexual exploration or activity even though you could see or feel that your partner wasn’t completely comfortable?
Even if you loved or cared about the person, even if you didn’t mean any harm, even if any other reasons you have told yourself, and even if you are a woman or vulva owner!
Just like Daphne in Bridgerton, boundary violations easily happen in loving relationships, even with the best of intentions.
Boundary violations exist on a spectrum, and the more we understand consent, the more we see how to practise it in every area of life.
If you are feeling a sense of unease reading this, I hope you can comfort yourself that everybody is capable of it, because this is the product of the culture we come from and are immersed in.
This is why the term “rape culture” exists, or if it could be renamed, “non-consensual culture.”
None of us learned consent properly, and we do not come from a consensual society. We are all both the victims and perpetrators on different levels- although this exists on a spectrum, and there are many people who need direct intervention to prevent more harm. If you have been the victim of assault, remember that it was not your fault, I have listed some resources below to get the support you need.
Humans are complicated.
We are all capable of being predators as it is hardwired into our nervous system, which is not “bad” in itself, it just takes more awareness.
If you are reading this feeling intense guilt or shame, find a place to process this, and be mindful if you need to make reparations to people you may have hurt.
Let’s aim to do better and be better, and embody consent in all areas of our lives.
Here are some ideas to get started:
Resources: